[Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Moderators: dorpond, trevor, Azhrei, giliath, Gamerdude, jay, Mr.Ice
-
- Cave Troll
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:50 pm
[Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Didn't try this is 5.1.1, but basically I had a monster that did a save ends -2 to all defenses every round and by the end it looked like it was cumulatively stacking.
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
I was under the impression that is proper according to the rules (and the general rule that anything cool doesn't stack, but anything that sucks, stacks like a motherfather).
-
- Cave Troll
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:50 pm
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
I'm not quite sure rule wise how its supposed to stack. Guess I'll have to look that up (Monster was a Nightwalker MM1). There did seem to be more of a problem than just that though. It seemed like it lowered defense 2 the first time, and 6 the next time. It also didn't reset the defenses to the correct number after the affect was removed. That was the main problem.
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Okay, so it may be okay to stack, but it's obviously not okay to stack wrong. I recall that being a particularly thorny fix I did a while back for some other issue. I'll revisit it!Generic_Rogue wrote:I'm not quite sure rule wise how its supposed to stack. Guess I'll have to look that up (Monster was a Nightwalker MM1). There did seem to be more of a problem than just that though. It seemed like it lowered defense 2 the first time, and 6 the next time. It also didn't reset the defenses to the correct number after the affect was removed. That was the main problem.
-
- Cave Troll
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:50 pm
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
So, was this working as intended or was something wrong? Or did it get fixed?
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
I haven't looked at it yet.
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Okay, I looked at it, and it's a case of "Rumble can't do math, plus he wasn't thinking."
The primary issue is that my approach was pretty much all wrong. The secondary issue is that going back to the original approach, before I implemented Wrongness, isn't right either, because there may be an issue with stacking positive modifiers.
I believe the general rule is something like "If it benefits you, it never stacks, but if it sucks, stack it up." However, I have to re-read the rules on that and then figure out what to do. It's not as easy as I'd hoped.
The primary issue is that my approach was pretty much all wrong. The secondary issue is that going back to the original approach, before I implemented Wrongness, isn't right either, because there may be an issue with stacking positive modifiers.
I believe the general rule is something like "If it benefits you, it never stacks, but if it sucks, stack it up." However, I have to re-read the rules on that and then figure out what to do. It's not as easy as I'd hoped.
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Chris,
Same named element don't stack. So if you have -2 DEFENSE PENALTY from "Stinky Residue" and are hit with another "Stinky Residue", you only have -2 DEFENSE PENALTY.
Same named element don't stack. So if you have -2 DEFENSE PENALTY from "Stinky Residue" and are hit with another "Stinky Residue", you only have -2 DEFENSE PENALTY.
Re: [Rumble 5.10] Cumulative stacking of Defense penalties
Okay, cool. I haven't had a chance to mess with this yet, but that helps.