Uhm. Why?aku wrote:follow the path of photoshop, and group all like icons into one...
It's not like they occupy a huge chunk of space.
Moderators: dorpond, trevor, Azhrei
i think that would work better with something like photoshop, where you will often have 6ish tools all linked to one icon, but with this, where right now atleast, theres going to be 3 seperate icons, i think having a seperate area for them might be over kill...dorpond wrote:I like the idea of having a higher root level for the root function and then having a sub area where that root item breaks down.
For example, have a drawing icon -when we click on it, a bunch of icons appear in a secondary window(or area) that are all drawing related. When we click on a different root icon like FOW, all FOW releated options appear in that secondary window.
The key to succees is not to overwhelm new users with a ton of buttons to search through. While the Photoshop idea would work, I don't care for it and I use Photoshop all the time.
Welcome back ! Stay a spellKuprin wrote: This looks good...we've come a ways since I was last around. How does the network code feel now? I remember we were having truckloads of compatability issues in testing when I was screwing with it, because of one guy on a 98 machine, a couple on XP, and the rest in Linux...