Fair enough. Thanks!
Search found 256 matches
- Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:50 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: MapTool 1.7.0 Released
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8046
- Thu Jun 11, 2020 1:46 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: MapTool 1.7.0 Released
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8046
Re: MapTool 1.7.0 Released
The padding on the left has always been there for chat output or standard output from macros. If you use broadcast that goes away. What changed is that the user/token name is now part of the first line of output to avoid situations like this: Screenshot 2020-06-11 10.59.46.png Now you get this: Scr...
- Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:54 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: MapTool 1.7.0 Released
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8046
Re: MapTool 1.7.0 Released
Thanks very much! It seems there's a blank "placeholder" area separated by a vertical grey line at the beginning of chat messages made without an impersonated token as of this update. Is there a way to disable that change? I've had no luck picking through the change log or Preferences. I d...
- Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:10 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: JSON array failing to make it to output of form
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4954
Re: JSON array failing to make it to output of form
The encode solution is good, however I found out an alternative work around. In the example posted, replace the quotes around [r: array] from " to ', so that "[r: array]" becomes '[r: array]' With this setup, the json is properly sent, and the output is: [{"FirstKey":"...
- Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:15 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: JSON array failing to make it to output of form
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4954
Re: JSON array failing to make it to output of form
I had a feeling that if anyone would be able to help me, it'd be you. Thanks again! It's strangely reassuring to know it's just a bug and not something I'm messing up. I'll keep that in mind and give your workaround a go. It's a bit more elegant than mine.
- Mon Sep 02, 2019 11:34 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: JSON array failing to make it to output of form
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4954
JSON array failing to make it to output of form
I've been having an issue with a form in some development I'm doing. One of the keys that gets passed to the output handling macro should have a value that is a JSON array of zero or more JSON objects. It shows up fine if displayed on the form itself. However, the key that appears in the output macr...
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 6:08 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
- Replies: 7
- Views: 740
Re: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
That makes sense. I might be on still too amateur a tier to make much productive use of that, but I can see the logic in it.
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:54 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
- Replies: 7
- Views: 740
Re: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
[h: modifiers = '{"Flanking":2,"Pants around ankles":-4}'] [H: output = "Your modifiers are: "] [H: modList = ""] [H, forEach(current, modifiers), code: { [H: modList = listAppend(modList,strformat("%s %+d",current,json.get(modifiers,current)),"...
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:11 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
- Replies: 7
- Views: 740
Re: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
As for the space, if there is nothing before it it may get lost with html formatting, which is what chat is. If you want to force a space I recommend and html entity Thanks very much! This has the privateOutput() function working just fine. I'm perhaps a little unclear as to how to best ...
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:31 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
- Replies: 7
- Views: 740
Mysterious output quirks - vanishing plus signs and spaces
Hello! I've hit the darnedest quirks in my recent macro coding that I was hoping perhaps someone could account for. Both are called as UDFs. Case 1: The disappearing space. Consider this function, whose purpose is to hide output if the variable "private" in the calling macro is set to 1. [...
- Sat May 18, 2019 6:23 pm
- Forum: MapTool
- Topic: Possible UPnP bug, trying to confirm
- Replies: 3
- Views: 496
Re: Possible UPnP bug, trying to confirm
The setting toggle issue seems to have rectified itself, assuming it's not a PEBCAK issue. :mrgreen: MT version is 1.5.2, router in question is a Linksys EA7300 running firmware 1.0.10.192945. According to the Linksys website, that is the current firmware update for this version of the device (v1), ...
- Tue May 14, 2019 3:28 pm
- Forum: MapTool
- Topic: Possible UPnP bug, trying to confirm
- Replies: 3
- Views: 496
Possible UPnP bug, trying to confirm
This is minor, and seems to have no impact on functionality other than being a minor nuisance, but I've been dealing with a consistent error message that seems related to UPnP. If I start a server with UPnP enabled, I get an error message on first attempting to disconnect the server, whether via dis...
- Sat Apr 20, 2019 9:49 pm
- Forum: Campaign Frameworks
- Topic: Exalted 2.5E Framework 1.09
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12077
Re: Exalted 2.5E Framework 1.09
Just finished up an Exalted 2.5E campaign, which I think has served as a sufficient test of the redone "2.0" version of this framework. I'll be posting it here once it gets tidied up. While a few things are not quite reimplemented, like social combat, it supports a much more robust in-fram...
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:34 pm
- Forum: TokenTool
- Topic: Custom TokenTool 1.0b32 (Nerps!)
- Replies: 69
- Views: 47814
Re: Custom TokenTool 1.0b32 (Nerps!)
Might be the wrong place to ask, but I checked out version 2.0 of your TokenTool branch. I'm super-pleased! But, it doesn't seem like it automatically includes the base image as a portrait any more. User error? Intentional omission? Unintentional omission? Dragging/saving as an .rptok was not inclu...
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:00 pm
- Forum: TokenTool
- Topic: Custom TokenTool 1.0b32 (Nerps!)
- Replies: 69
- Views: 47814
Re: Custom TokenTool 1.0b32 (Nerps!)
Might be the wrong place to ask, but I checked out version 2.0 of your TokenTool branch. I'm super-pleased! But, it doesn't seem like it automatically includes the base image as a portrait any more. User error? Intentional omission? Unintentional omission?