Search found 45 matches

by smartsoldier
Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:00 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7569

Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!

I have noticed a lack of updates lately =P Will there be any more Mote compatibility updates in the near future? I mainly want to use the checkboxes in the attack dialog (flurry, power attack, etc).
by smartsoldier
Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:22 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7569

Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!

You can find the line where the code fails and put in a check for an empty list so you don't try to convert it. This is assuming that json.toList is the problem. I just checked the function and it does error with this: [r: json.toList("")] And it probably shouldn't. I would report it as a...
by smartsoldier
Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:21 pm
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7569

Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!

Is there a way to make it not empty from the start? Like a null entry?
by smartsoldier
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:29 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7569

Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!

Hummm... we use them all the time (my Skull n Shackles campaign has been using Mote for a while now). Have you tried a stack size of 4MB? I know most work with 3MB but a few things want 4. For certain the default of 2MB will not be sufficient. The Rocket icon in Mote is used to change the stack siz...
by smartsoldier
Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:06 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7569

Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!

First of all, let me say thanks for taking so much time to make this amazing framework for Mote. I just have a few small things that weren't fixed in this new version, nothing game-breaking though. Since we started using your framework in Maptool it was always a blessing to be able to create our own...
by smartsoldier
Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:48 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7343

Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)

Hey, after the latest Mote update all weapon damage rolls default to 1. It will say "1d12 = 1" in the tooltip. Can you confirm and try to find out why? Hummm... just ran a session in Mote on Friday and did not have this issue. I do have an update coming soon that tweaks the output of most...
by smartsoldier
Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:18 pm
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7343

Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)

Hey, after the latest Mote update all weapon damage rolls default to 1. It will say "1d12 = 1" in the tooltip. Can you confirm and try to find out why?
by smartsoldier
Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:49 am
Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
Replies: 40
Views: 7343

Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)

Could you link me to that post on the Mote boards?
by smartsoldier
Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:48 am
Forum: Macros
Topic: Data type test?
Replies: 1
Views: 349

Data type test?

What is the function to test a variable's data type?
For example, "1d8" is a string but "6" is a number. I ask because I can eval(1d8) but eval(6) gives an error.
by smartsoldier
Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:31 pm
Forum: Macros
Topic: Workaround for nested {} limit?
Replies: 3
Views: 429

Re: Workaround for nested {} limit?

Ahh thanks, someone referenced that but I couldn't quite find it. One more question? [h: j=1] [h: tBAB=BAB] [while(tBAB>0, "<br>"),code: { [h: TotalATK = tempATK + StrB + tBAB + MiscATK + AtkBonus + AtkDice1 - PowerAimATK] In the above code, how can I get AtkDice1 to change to AtkDice2,Atk...
by smartsoldier
Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:57 pm
Forum: Macros
Topic: Workaround for nested {} limit?
Replies: 3
Views: 429

Workaround for nested {} limit?

I have a macro in which I need to use 3 sets of nested {} with code but as I discovered from searching here, you can only use a maximum of 2. Is there a workaround? if they choose full round attack, code:{ while Base Attack Bonus is decaying display attacks, code:{ if a critical attack is rolled, co...
by smartsoldier
Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:59 am
Forum: Macros
Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Replies: 6
Views: 543

Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token

Very cool and useful. Thanks!
by smartsoldier
Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:40 am
Forum: Macros
Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Replies: 6
Views: 543

Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token

[r: weap0=json.get(macro.args,"weap0")] [r: id=json.get(macro.args,"id")] [r: switchToken(id)] [r: getStrProp(weap0,"Name")] In the code above weap0 is Weapon0 because I can see it output in the chat window due to using an r: instead of h:. However, getStrProp keeps th...
by smartsoldier
Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:33 pm
Forum: Macros
Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Replies: 6
Views: 543

Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token

Ah, it wasn't on the same map thats why it wasnt working! Thanks a lot.
by smartsoldier
Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:56 pm
Forum: Macros
Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Replies: 6
Views: 543

Using json.get() on non-selected token

I have some macros running on a Lib token but I need them to pull some info from the json arrays on the parent token that was initially selected. I have successfully stored and given the token ID to the Lib macros but I cannot figure out how to point json.get() to my token ID. Maybe switchToken()?

Go to advanced search