Search found 45 matches
- Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:00 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20138
Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!
I have noticed a lack of updates lately =P Will there be any more Mote compatibility updates in the near future? I mainly want to use the checkboxes in the attack dialog (flurry, power attack, etc).
- Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:22 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20138
Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!
You can find the line where the code fails and put in a check for an empty list so you don't try to convert it. This is assuming that json.toList is the problem. I just checked the function and it does error with this: [r: json.toList("")] And it probably shouldn't. I would report it as a...
- Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:21 pm
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20138
Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!
Is there a way to make it not empty from the start? Like a null entry?
- Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:29 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20138
Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!
Hummm... we use them all the time (my Skull n Shackles campaign has been using Mote for a while now). Have you tried a stack size of 4MB? I know most work with 3MB but a few things want 4. For certain the default of 2MB will not be sufficient. The Rocket icon in Mote is used to change the stack siz...
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:06 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20138
Re: 91.07 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework NEW!
First of all, let me say thanks for taking so much time to make this amazing framework for Mote. I just have a few small things that weren't fixed in this new version, nothing game-breaking though. Since we started using your framework in Maptool it was always a blessing to be able to create our own...
- Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:48 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 19713
Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)
Hey, after the latest Mote update all weapon damage rolls default to 1. It will say "1d12 = 1" in the tooltip. Can you confirm and try to find out why? Hummm... just ran a session in Mote on Friday and did not have this issue. I do have an update coming soon that tweaks the output of most...
- Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:18 pm
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 19713
Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)
Hey, after the latest Mote update all weapon damage rolls default to 1. It will say "1d12 = 1" in the tooltip. Can you confirm and try to find out why?
- Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:49 am
- Forum: D&D 3.5/Pathfinder 1e Campaign Macros
- Topic: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework
- Replies: 40
- Views: 19713
Re: 91.06 Pathfinder + D&D3.5 Framework (RELEASED!)
Could you link me to that post on the Mote boards?
- Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:48 am
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Data type test?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 393
Data type test?
What is the function to test a variable's data type?
For example, "1d8" is a string but "6" is a number. I ask because I can eval(1d8) but eval(6) gives an error.
For example, "1d8" is a string but "6" is a number. I ask because I can eval(1d8) but eval(6) gives an error.
- Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:31 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Workaround for nested {} limit?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 497
Re: Workaround for nested {} limit?
Ahh thanks, someone referenced that but I couldn't quite find it. One more question? [h: j=1] [h: tBAB=BAB] [while(tBAB>0, "<br>"),code: { [h: TotalATK = tempATK + StrB + tBAB + MiscATK + AtkBonus + AtkDice1 - PowerAimATK] In the above code, how can I get AtkDice1 to change to AtkDice2,Atk...
- Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:57 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Workaround for nested {} limit?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 497
Workaround for nested {} limit?
I have a macro in which I need to use 3 sets of nested {} with code but as I discovered from searching here, you can only use a maximum of 2. Is there a workaround? if they choose full round attack, code:{ while Base Attack Bonus is decaying display attacks, code:{ if a critical attack is rolled, co...
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:59 am
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
- Replies: 6
- Views: 630
Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Very cool and useful. Thanks!
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:40 am
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
- Replies: 6
- Views: 630
Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token
[r: weap0=json.get(macro.args,"weap0")] [r: id=json.get(macro.args,"id")] [r: switchToken(id)] [r: getStrProp(weap0,"Name")] In the code above weap0 is Weapon0 because I can see it output in the chat window due to using an r: instead of h:. However, getStrProp keeps th...
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:33 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
- Replies: 6
- Views: 630
Re: Using json.get() on non-selected token
Ah, it wasn't on the same map thats why it wasnt working! Thanks a lot.
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:56 pm
- Forum: Macros
- Topic: Using json.get() on non-selected token
- Replies: 6
- Views: 630
Using json.get() on non-selected token
I have some macros running on a Lib token but I need them to pull some info from the json arrays on the parent token that was initially selected. I have successfully stored and given the token ID to the Lib macros but I cannot figure out how to point json.get() to my token ID. Maybe switchToken()?