RPTools.net

Are you launching the downloaded/setup exe to start or running it from the Windows start menu (assuming windows)?

It may also check for new versions (jwrapper is used and does additional things behind the scenes). This will be changed/removed in future versions.

It very well could be. Being a hobby project, one can never say for sure how long anything will take. It'll be done when it's done. I do however have it "launching" currently but with lots of errors. There's so much to rip out and replace it's not funny. When I did TokenTool it took about ...

This should be more easily done with 1.4.1.9+ IF using javapackager to deploy as you get a static directory (in fact, should be user changeable during setup). JWrapper will be going away, I'm just not sure what @Azhrei has planned (as he wants to keep the Launcher and use jlink or something)

NP. Life happens so things get...delayed? :) Anyhoo,ya. I had put this on the back burner for what I'm calling MapTool 2.0 which is a pretty big rewrite converting over from a swing awt application to using JavaFX. I actually just started on it this month and...well, it's going to take months and mo...

Via a macro for a single token? No. There is a restoreFoW() function that restores FoW for the whole map and then you can exposeFoW() for a single token.

If you are using 1.4.1.8 then there should be a "Launcher" app, run that and adjust the memory. Note: you can also let it be blank and therefore have no max and it'll use as much as needed (up to a point) but with 32 you should be just fine. Another note: One reason to set a lower max memo...

I thought it had one built in already? I know there are a LOT of macros to sift through but there should be one.

I had one many moons ago but started customizing it for Pathfinder...

FYI: Yea, I had to get a good list so I could add them as keywords for the editor. Sadly that then required editing another text file, run an external jar to create the class files for injection for the syntax highlighter. Never got a chance to find a way to automate/internalize it so adding new mac...

I'm slowly working on one. I was going to start changing the current PF framework over but the more and more I thought about it the better I thought it would be to just start over from "scratch". So much has changed and there are a few pain points/laggy parts that need to be fixed I'm opti...

FYI: I already added a -macro argument to my fork that logs out all the functions in that version... basically: if (listMacros) { String logOutput = null; List<String> macroList = parser.listAllMacroFunctions(); Collections.sort(macroList); for (String macro : macroList) { logOutput += "\n"...

Correct, it only reveals FoW at the end point and at waypoints. Otherwise it reveals at every cell along the way. It's for performance or you have a reason to reveal that way. (It's useful if moving tokens 1000 feet or such). Or if you make a map with lots of lights and performance degrades, it's on...

That could be true... So if you just comment you are working on it one of the admins can "assign" the issue to you.

I didn't see an open pull request? Do you have a PR #?

Yea, it's still a very early beta with hard coded links and such, not ready for a public beta...

And before working on it, it would be appreciated if you assigned the issue to yourself. You could also comment on it and if it's complicated, a plan of attack. Most of us get emails/alerts when Issues are updated and respond right back to the issue with comments/suggestions.