Azhrei wrote:It's also ridiculous to think that a glitch in a product that has already been corrected should generate this much vitriol from you. Was today a particularly bad day at work or something?
First, it hasn't been "corrected" for the product I bought as far as I can tell. And it came out well after the Legacy of Fire Map Folio discussion you linked (I'm talking about the CoT Map Folio.)
After hunting down and installing Acrobat 8 (which I will just as quickly remove with a system restore to a pre-install date), I was able to drag out the images. Thank you for the tip. However, though most of the maps did remove the text, some didn't. Some others kept secret doors in place. And 3 of the maps were arbitrarily broken into 6, 11, and 12 pieces respectively... all of which I will have to stitch together and then cut apart appropriately.
I also had to manually rename 54 files because they don't drag out with the appropriate names.
So, again, I hardly feel that the issue is "corrected." And the convenience of buying the map-pack in the first place is significantly lowered with all of this extra work.
Second, what was vitriolic about my response? You think it's acceptable that the editors at Paizo would put out a map-pack that didn't work as expected on Acrobat 9 (let alone Acrobat 9 Professional)? I don't. The good majority of users out there (due to the way Adobe "updates" their software automatically) were likely using it. Heck, it doesn't work in Foxit either (the second most popular PDF reader.) I also think their lack of foresight that someone buying a map-pack wouldn't want DM text all over the maps is pretty sad. I'm a Paizo supporter, but I'm not going to defend their mistakes or half-assed corrections of them. I'll make my opinion known and vote with my dollar.
If there is a particular program or method that users are expected to follow in order to use their products, I believe the onus should be on the company to provide such information *with* their products (particularly if they want return customers.) When someone buys a piece of software, it's customary to tell them what they need in order to use said product. How hard would it have been for them to update their products with a couple paragraphs telling people what software to use and how to use it? Especially when it's suggested that they *not* use the most popular readers if they want to do anything with the PDF other than look at it.
So, again, they *could* have just unlocked the PDF to begin with rather than have people jump through all these hoops. The PDF is essentially "unprotected" anyway if you can go back and do this... it's just most annoying to people who paid for it rather than people who've trolled for cracked versions. It's this type failed "protection" that drives people to piracy.
Speaking of which, I was able to use a trial hack program to open up the first few pages of the folio for use in Acrobat 9 Professional. And, for $50, I could open up the rest.
(And don't get me started on "industry standards". We both know how that will turn out.
)
And no, I don't know how an argument on "industry standards" will turn out. It usually comes down to whoever has the biggest... Opinion. Anyway, I think you understood perfectly what I was talking about and have chosen to be argumentative.
Methinks I should be asking if *you* had a bad day.
I prefer that it comes out in a non-lossy format like TIFF. Don't suppose it preserves layers when you do this?
I don't know what you're referring to. When I select an image and drag it to the desktop, I get a TIFF image. Does TIFF support layers? I didn't think it did. But if it's important to you I'm certainly willing to try it and let you know...
Yes, TIFF's support layers. Back in the day, when space was a real premium, I used layered TIFF's with LZW compression in lieu of PSD files because they actually created considerably smaller files. As a result, I still heavily use them (hence my comment about AI having issues with TIFF files.)
That said, I'd be interested to know if Acrobat on the MAC does export layered TIFFs. My guess is that it doesn't (but it would be really cool if it did.) On a PC Acrobat 8 exports the file as BMP's so it doesn't have layers.